Monday

Israel Escalates Air Strikes on Iran Amid Intensifying Conflict

 

Washington, D.C. — Tensions in the Middle East soared on Friday as Israel launched a third consecutive day of air strikes targeting sites inside Iran. The escalation follows weeks of heightened rhetoric and a dramatic exchange of missile attacks that has left hundreds dead or wounded on both sides.

Israeli authorities issued stark warnings to Iranian civilians, urging them to evacuate military production facilities as the Israeli military signaled its readiness to use even greater force if necessary. Iranian officials reported at least 128 fatalities and more than 900 injuries from the Israeli bombardments.

Iran retaliated with its own missile barrage, killing 13 people and injuring over 360 in Israel. The Iranian foreign minister indicated that Tehran would cease attacks if Israel agreed to stop its strikes, suggesting the possibility of de-escalation remained open.


Scenes of Destruction in Israel

Reporting live from Tel Aviv, Fox News Chief Foreign Correspondent Trey Yingst described the aftermath of the Iranian missile assault.

More than 250 ballistic missiles have been fired into Israel since hostilities broke out, with some penetrating the country’s sophisticated air defense systems and striking residential neighborhoods.

“Just last night, 11 people were killed when missiles hit apartment buildings,” Yingst reported. “This morning, rescue teams were combing through rubble in central Israel, searching for survivors. Among the missing was a man in his 50s whose injured son, still in a hospital gown after escaping the blast, anxiously waited for news.”

Israeli air strikes, meanwhile, targeted Iranian military installations, energy infrastructure, and reportedly nuclear sites. Among those killed in Iran, local media claimed, were nuclear scientists and senior members of the Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Israeli officials underscored the distinction between their military objectives and Iran’s retaliation. “We are hitting military and nuclear targets,” one Israeli source said. “Iran is deliberately firing ballistic missiles at civilians.”


Exclusive Interview with Prime Minister Netanyahu

Speaking with Fox News anchor Bret Baier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the timing and scale of Israel’s offensive.

“We were facing an imminent, existential threat,” Netanyahu said. “Iran was racing to weaponize enriched uranium for atomic bombs and rapidly expanding its ballistic missile arsenal.”

He warned that Iran was on track to produce thousands of long-range missiles within a few years, capable of delivering massive warheads directly into Israeli cities at hypersonic speeds.

“No country can survive that—certainly not one the size of Israel,” Netanyahu declared. “We acted at the last possible moment to save ourselves and to prevent the world’s most dangerous regime from acquiring the world’s most dangerous weapons.”


Questioning U.S. Intelligence Assessments

Baier pressed Netanyahu on a key point of contention: a recent U.S. intelligence assessment indicating Iran had not actively pursued nuclear weapons since 2003.

“The intelligence we shared with the United States was absolutely clear,” Netanyahu countered. “They were secretly working to weaponize uranium, moving quickly toward a nuclear device that could be operational in less than a year.”

He insisted that the difference between six months, twelve months, or more was irrelevant. “Once they cross that threshold, it’s too late,” he said. “We will not allow another Holocaust. Not now, not ever.”


As the conflict intensifies, the risk of a broader regional war continues to grow, with both sides trading threats and casualties mounting. The United States has called for restraint, but diplomatic options appear to be narrowing as military operations expand.


Netanyahu Defends Israel’s Expanded Strikes on Iran, Warns of Nuclear Threat

Washington, D.C. — As Israeli airstrikes pound Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure for a fourth consecutive day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly defended the scope and timing of the campaign, arguing that Israel is acting to preempt an “existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions and ballistic missile program.

Speaking in a wide-ranging interview, Netanyahu also said that the strikes have deliberately targeted Iran’s nuclear scientists, military command, and intelligence leadership—confirming Israeli responsibility for the killing of Iran’s chief intelligence officer and his deputy in Tehran.

He framed these operations as necessary to dismantle Iran’s capacity to rapidly develop atomic weapons and deliver them via advanced missile systems that could one day reach not only Israel, but the U.S. East Coast.


Strategic Objectives: Dismantling Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Programs

When asked to clarify the goal of the campaign, Netanyahu insisted that Israel is not formally pursuing regime change in Iran—but acknowledged that could be a consequence if Iran’s leadership continues on its current path.

“The regime in Iran is weak, kept in power only by violence and repression,” he said. “If the Iranian people were free to choose, 80% would throw these thugs out tomorrow.”

Netanyahu described Iran’s leadership as a “terrorist regime” that oppresses its own citizens while exporting instability and violence across the Middle East. He cited Iran’s support for militant groups from Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Houthis in Yemen as evidence of Tehran’s willingness to destabilize the region—even without nuclear weapons.


“We Couldn’t Wait Any Longer”

Defending the timing of Israel’s military operation, Netanyahu claimed intelligence showed Iran was mere months from being able to assemble an initial nuclear device, having already stockpiled enough enriched uranium for multiple bombs.

“It was the last hour,” he said. “We could have waited for endless negotiations while they advanced their program. We chose to act.”

He rejected criticism that the strikes would entrench Iranian hardliners or trigger wider war, insisting that failing to act would have guaranteed a far greater catastrophe later.


Targeted Killings and Intelligence Operations

Netanyahu confirmed that Israeli forces had successfully targeted senior Iranian figures, including the country’s chief nuclear scientists and top intelligence commanders.

“When you’re talking about someone like Hitler’s nuclear scientist, do you let them go?” he said. “Of course not.”

He emphasized that Israel is striking military and nuclear sites, not civilian targets—contrasting that with Iran’s missile attacks on Israeli population centers.

“They bomb civilians; we go after their military command and nuclear infrastructure,” Netanyahu said.


Warning of a Broader Threat to the United States

In unusually direct language, Netanyahu argued that Iran’s nuclear weapons program is not just a threat to Israel, but to the U.S. and its allies worldwide.

“They’re working on intercontinental ballistic missiles,” he warned. “Right now they can reach 8,000 kilometers. With small upgrades, they can reach the Eastern Seaboard of the United States.”

He accused Iran of orchestrating assassination attempts on former President Donald Trump “through proxies,” calling Trump Iran’s “enemy number one” because he had abandoned the 2015 nuclear deal and imposed maximum pressure sanctions.

“They tried to kill President Trump twice,” Netanyahu claimed, without providing additional details.


Coordination with the United States

Netanyahu also described close coordination with the U.S. government, saying that Israeli leaders informed President Trump of their plans in advance.

“Obviously we informed our American friends and President Trump—a great friend—ahead of time,” he said. “We are fully coordinated.”

He praised the U.S. for helping defend Israeli airspace, noting American pilots have intercepted drones headed toward Israeli cities and U.S. missile batteries have reinforced Israeli defenses.


Capabilities Against Hardened Targets

Pressed on whether Israel can destroy deeply buried nuclear sites like Iran’s Fordow facility, Netanyahu refused to discuss operational details.

However, he claimed Israel had already destroyed key facilities such as the Isfahan uranium conversion plant—describing it as “critical” to Iran’s weapons program.

He hinted at Israel’s advanced military innovations, saying only: “We have quite a few startups and quite a few rabbits up our sleeve.”


A Broader Battle of Civilization

Netanyahu framed the current military campaign in existential terms.

“This is not just our fight,” he said. “It is the wider battle of civilization against barbarism. We are not only defending ourselves; we are defending the world.”

He warned that if Iran were ever allowed to obtain nuclear weapons, it would not only use them to threaten Israel but would provide them to proxies across the region, ushering in an era of nuclear terrorism.

“The people chanting ‘Death to America’—do you want them to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to your cities?” he asked rhetorically. “Of course not.”


Assessing the Damage to Iran’s Nuclear Program

While declining to provide specific estimates, Netanyahu said Israel’s strikes had set Iran’s nuclear program back significantly and caught Iranian leadership by surprise.

“We could have waited and waited, but we chose to act,” he said. “We’re geared to do whatever is necessary to eliminate two existential threats: the nuclear threat and the ballistic missile threat.”


As fighting intensifies, diplomatic options continue to narrow. The international community remains deeply concerned that further escalation could ignite a wider regional war, but Israeli leaders have signaled they will not stand down until they believe Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been decisively checked.

Friday

'Gutfeld!': Former Biden doc, ‘poor guy’ who should be pardoned for this

 

Greg Gutfeld opens with jokes about Alyssa Farah Griffin crying on The View, suggesting it's either stress or the onions they slice for their daily pig roast. He moves on to news that more than half of East Coast beaches tested positive for fecal contamination, sarcastically claiming they tracked the source.

He jokes about Tim Baltz charging taxpayers $430,000 in legal fees to help prepare to testify before Congress, quipping that while he can't define a woman, he can sure spend like one.

Next, he roasts Kamala Harris, saying she went with her "guts" when choosing Tim Baltz as a running mate and sarcastically speculates about what was in them.

Greg jokes about the BBC releasing images of early human species, with punchlines about their age and appearance.

He then turns to President Biden's former doctor refusing to answer questions about Biden’s health, joking he’d be the perfect doctor to treat Greg’s “secret warts” and saying when asked about Biden’s decline, he referred them to the coroner’s report.

He ridicules Mattel for introducing a Barbie with type 1 diabetes, saying people laughed at his idea for "AIDS Ken."

He cracks a joke about a college student growing a beard as a “symbolic middle finger,” with a woman replying she grew hers for the same reason.

Returning to Biden's former doctor pleading the Fifth before Congress, Greg jokes that doctor-patient privilege is the only thing stopping his own doctor from revealing his birthmark that looks like Brit Hume. He jokes the doctor must constantly deal with Biden’s fragile health, describing outlandish vet-style treatments like popping back his shoulder, removing worms from his leg, or pulling a chipmunk out of his rear.

Greg says Biden's doctor wasn't alone defending him, getting help from a "stupid person from Texas" who insists on confidentiality. Greg says yes, people have the right to privacy but also not to be lied to about the president’s mental capacity. He says Biden has "a brain more shattered than a chair on The View" and roasts Democrats for pretending his decline is news to them.

He jokes about former CNN analysts being shocked Biden couldn’t be trusted outside staged events, comparing this revelation to discovering John Travolta is gaining weight.

Greg says they don't want Biden's doctor in jail because he'd be "passed around like P Diddy's girlfriend at a freak-off" but they do want the real story about his health. He speculates about why Parkinson’s specialists visited so often. He jokes maybe the doctor needs immunity to "spill the beans" without incriminating himself, even pardoning him for his haircut.

He concludes that the real blame lies not with the doctor but with the people around Biden giving orders—and he wants "their scalps."

Then he introduces the night's guests:

  • Michael Malice, author of Not Sick of Winning.

  • Julie Banderas, Fox News anchor.

  • Chef and restaurant owner Andrew Gruel.

  • Kat Timpf, libertarian author and Fox News contributor.

Michael Malice says pleading the Fifth was smart—why talk to authorities if you can get away with not doing it? He jokes about Trump's doctor dying not long after his office got raided.

Greg riffs on the idea that a "normal-brained Biden" administration wouldn’t be much different.

Julie Banderas criticizes the media for failing to ask tough questions, joking they should have asked the doctor about his bad haircut instead. She argues that pleading the Fifth over whether he lied about Biden’s health basically confirms he did.

Andrew Gruel adds that this scandal is layered and the media tries to act like heroes despite their cover-up. He jokes that the "stutter fly effect" (a play on "butterfly effect") is being used as an excuse, leading to inflation and a crashing economy.

Greg ends with a joke about how giving the media the job of investigating themselves is like giving yourself a prostate exam—you’d need to be really limber to pull it off.

ICE Arrests Notorious MS-13 Kingpin in Nebraska: Officials Slam Border Failures

 BREAKING: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have arrested Melvin Varela Perez, a notorious MS-13 kingpin, in Omaha, Nebraska. Varela Perez had been on El Salvador’s most wanted list for nearly a decade but was reportedly released into the United States after crossing the border illegally in 2023.

Authorities say this arrest highlights a major failure in the U.S. border vetting system. Despite being on international watch lists, including El Salvador’s top 100 most-wanted criminals in 2016 and 2019, Varela Perez was paroled into the country last year.

Interview Excerpt with Border Security Advisor Tom Homan

Host: “How in the world could that have happened?”

Homan:
“This is just one example of what we've seen over the last four years. The Biden administration lied when they said everyone released into the country was properly vetted—they weren’t.
This information about Perez was public and easily found, yet the administration’s main directive to Border Patrol has been ‘process quickly, release quickly.’ They wanted to avoid overcrowding to claim the border was secure. Meanwhile, they kept lying to the American people. Under President Trump, we deported countless criminals—including murderers and sex offenders—because they were properly vetted. But under Biden, that system collapsed.”

Host John:
“Perez was arrested alongside another man, Rene Escobar, who had an Interpol red notice for conspiracy to commit murder. How did they miss that?”

Homan:
“It’s incompetence. Border Patrol under this administration was told to process as quickly as possible, with limited vetting. ICE was restricted from arresting people just for being here illegally unless they had a conviction, not just a warrant. That’s how these criminals slipped through. We’re now working across the country trying to find and remove the dangerous people this administration released.”

On the Scale of the Problem

Homan warned that Perez and Escobar are only the tip of the iceberg:

“We know there are 600,000 illegal aliens with criminal records walking the streets of this country. We have 2 million known ‘got-aways’—people who crossed the border under Biden without being stopped or vetted at all. We’re working with ICE, the FBI, and the intelligence community to track them down.”

Pushback Against Criticism of ICE

Homan defended ICE agents facing public criticism:

“The media keeps lying about ICE raids in schools and churches—which isn’t happening. We’re focusing on public safety threats. These men and women are American heroes.
But from day one, we knew they’d be vilified. The opposition hates Trump more than they love their communities. But we’re not giving up. We have over a thousand teams looking every single day. We are not stopping.”

Local Homeland Security Reaction

Mark Zeno of Homeland Security Investigations praised the arrests, saying:

“These illegal aliens didn’t just sneak into our country. They brought a legacy of violence, terror, and death. They thought they could hide in America’s heartland, but were sadly mistaken. Not on our watch.”

Breaking: Disturbance Interrupts Trump Rally as Former President Escorted from Stage

 


[BUTLER, PA], [Jul 13, 2024] — Former President Donald Trump was abruptly rushed off stage by Secret Service agents after a disturbance broke out during his rally speech today.

Trump had been criticizing the Biden administration’s immigration record, displaying a chart he claimed showed “the lowest amount of illegal immigration ever in recorded history” under his presidency.

“That arrow is the lowest amount of illegal immigration ever in recorded history into our country. Then the worst president in the history of our country took over, and look what happened. Probably 20 million people—and that’s a little bit old, that chart is a couple of months old,” Trump said moments before the interruption.

As he continued speaking, loud noises and commotion erupted in the crowd. Broadcast footage showed agents reacting immediately, forming a protective ring around Trump.

“We are live. Former President Trump was speaking on the stage. There has been some kind of disturbance that clearly set law enforcement and Secret Service into motion,” a reporter narrated. “They immediately jumped around the former president in a protective mode.”

Spectators screamed and shouted, with some voices yelling, “Are we ready to go? Are we ready to go?” as security moved into position.

The situation appeared tense and chaotic. Trump was seen raising his arm and appeared to be holding it in discomfort as agents guided him away.

“This does not look good,” the reporter said on-air. “They are attempting to move him out, but he may have been injured. He is holding up his arm.”

No official details about the nature of the disturbance or Trump’s condition were immediately available. Secret Service and local law enforcement have not released a statement at this time.

The rally crowd was left in confusion as security personnel worked to secure the venue. Updates are expected as authorities investigate the incident.

Interview with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (Zelenskyy asked whether he owes Trump an apology)

 

Bret welcomes President Zelenskyy back and thanks him for making time for the interview. Bret mentions that President Trump said Zelenskyy disrespected him, the Vice President, and all of America in the Oval Office. He asks Zelenskyy if he thinks he did and whether he owes Trump an apology.

Zelenskyy thanks Americans for their support and says he is grateful to President Trump and Congress for bipartisan support. He emphasizes Ukraine’s strategic partnership with the US, their need for honest and direct dialogue, and the shared goal of ending the war. He says nobody wants to end it more than Ukrainians because they are the ones fighting and dying. He stresses the importance of unity to stop Putin, saying he’s heard Trump promise to stop the war and hopes he will. He calls for early, honest dialogue to understand each other, noting that peace is more than the absence of war—it’s about lasting peace, freedom, justice, and human rights. He points out that Putin has broken cease-fire agreements many times over the years.

Bret presses him about whether he thinks he owes President Trump an apology. Zelenskyy says he respects Trump and the American people, but he’s not sure they did anything wrong. He says some discussions should happen privately, out of the media spotlight, but stresses that Ukraine’s position needs to be understood.

Bret asks about reports that Zelenskyy was told to make the meeting about a minerals deal and economic cooperation, leaving security guarantees to be negotiated step by step. Zelenskyy confirms they’re ready to sign the document as a first step toward security guarantees but says it’s not enough. He wants to understand Trump’s plan to stop Putin, noting it’s a sensitive issue for Ukrainians who have been fighting for years and want America firmly on their side.

Bret asks if the public spat in the Oval Office helped Ukrainians. Zelenskyy says it wasn’t good for either side but refuses to change Ukraine’s stance toward Russia, calling them killers. He praises the US and Europe as Ukraine’s best friends but insists on recognizing the harsh reality.

Bret asks if Trump is right to believe Zelenskyy will never sign a deal with Putin. Zelenskyy says Ukraine wants peace and diplomacy but must negotiate from a position of strength, with security guarantees in place and strong support from partners like the US and Europe.

Bret quotes Trump leaving the White House saying Zelenskyy just wants to fight. He asks if Zelenskyy wants to keep fighting or wants peace. Zelenskyy says they want peace, which is why he’s in the US discussing deals aimed at security guarantees. But he says they can’t just stop fighting while Putin remains a threat. Ukrainians remember how the war began, and no one wants another wave of occupation. If not NATO membership, he wants to build "NATO in Ukraine" with real security guarantees.

Bret asks whether Ukraine can win or hold off Russia without continued US support. Zelenskyy says it will be difficult without that support, which is why he’s there negotiating. He says they can’t lose their people or their freedom, and points out the atrocities Russians committed in Ukraine.

Bret asks about next steps. Zelenskyy says Europe is ready to help financially and militarily, and they’re working to figure out what role the US will play in security guarantees. Once that’s clear, they can move to diplomatic negotiations with Russia and Europe. He says without enough weapons, pushing Russia out would take too long, but security guarantees would enable negotiations.

Bret cites Senator Lindsey Graham, who said after the meeting that he found Zelenskyy disrespectful and suggested Zelenskyy should resign. Zelenskyy says only Ukrainians can make that decision, and he’s not going to step down just to make a peace deal. He stresses that Ukraine is grateful for US support and wants only strong, honest partnerships.

Bret notes that Democrats had the opposite reaction, accusing Trump of helping Putin. He asks Zelenskyy if the confrontation in the Oval Office was pre-planned. Zelenskyy says he doesn’t know but doesn’t think so. He says what upset him was hearing US politicians downplay Ukraine’s sacrifices, suggesting Ukraine was almost destroyed or had lost millions. He stresses that each loss matters and that Ukrainians don't want to forget what Russia did. He says this isn’t about him—it’s about preserving the friendship between Ukraine and the US.

Bret asks if sensitive conversations should have happened behind closed doors. Zelenskyy says yes, he regrets the public argument because some things are too sensitive for media. He emphasizes that honesty and understanding are critical to not losing their friendship with the US.

Asked about the next steps, Zelenskyy says the deal on minerals was prepared over weeks and should be signed soon. He stresses that they want to understand what part of security guarantees it covers and what the next steps are, because Ukrainians hate surprises during wartime.

Bret points out the minerals deal didn’t contain security guarantees. Zelenskyy says it’s part of the plan. He notes Trump suggested it would mean production and investment in areas Putin wouldn’t touch. But Zelenskyy warns not to trust Putin, explaining that Russia has previously occupied territories with American companies on them. He sees the deal as a good idea for business but insists on real guarantees.

Bret asks if Trump is too close to Putin. Zelenskyy says Trump has always said he wants to be in the middle so he can bring the sides to the table. Zelenskyy says he wants Trump to be more clearly on Ukraine’s side because Russia brought the war to Ukraine. He insists Ukrainians want to hear a strong US stance against Russia.

Bret asks about concerns over corruption and whether US money is being properly tracked. Zelenskyy says it’s very open and digitalized. He explains that most of the $100 billion was weapons delivered directly and tracked, while about $31 billion was direct financial support. He invites anyone to verify the accounting.

Finally, Bret asks if Zelenskyy’s relationship with Trump can be salvaged. Zelenskyy says yes, because the relationship is bigger than just two presidents. It’s a historic, strong connection between the Ukrainian and American people, and he’s confident they’ll maintain it.

Monday

Interview with Dr. Victor Gao on China-Iran Relations and the Israel-Iran Conflict

 We now speak with Dr. Victor Gao, Vice President of the Center for China and Globalization, joining us from Beijing.

Host:
Dr. Gao, always a pleasure to speak with you. We've never discussed the state of relations between China and Iran before, so let’s begin there. How would you describe the current ties between Beijing and Tehran?

Dr. Gao:
Thank you for having me. China highly respects Iran as a sovereign nation with territorial integrity. The two countries engage on equal terms. China does not recognize the extraterritoriality of any nation’s self-imposed sanctions against others, including those against China or Iran. We cooperate with Iran in all areas, including energy. If a third country has an issue with this, the problem lies with them and their unilateral policies.

Regarding the war initiated by Israel against Iran, China's position is clear: Israel’s attack on Iran's nuclear facilities is a violation of international norms and a serious threat to world peace.

Host:
Israeli officials claim Iran is close to building, or may already possess, nuclear weapons and frequently calls for Israel’s destruction. They argue their actions are acts of preemptive self-defense. What's your response?

Dr. Gao:
It is highly hypocritical for Israel, which itself possesses nuclear weapons in violation of international norms, to accuse Iran. The Middle East would be better off if Israel disarmed. If Israel keeps threatening others with nuclear weapons, it's a major issue for global peace. The international community must address this.

Host:
President Xi Jinping expressed deep concern about Israel’s military operations against Iran. How dangerous is the current situation?

Dr. Gao:
China always worries when wars break out. This surprise attack by Israel resembles Japan's Pearl Harbor assault in WWII. It came while the U.S. and Iran were still discussing nuclear negotiations. Israel’s attack, including the assassination of Iranian officials, is a grave matter. The risk of escalation—potentially even into nuclear war—is real. Iran might now feel justified to develop nuclear weapons, which would destabilize the region further. It’s time for Prime Minister Netanyahu to stop this madness.

Host:
On Tuesday, China accused President Trump of “pouring oil on the fire” in this conflict. Why?

Dr. Gao:
Evidence suggests a joint U.S.-Israel operation. Even if the U.S. claims to be uninvolved, there’s likely deep coordination. If the U.S. is not involved, they should prove it—and more importantly, use their influence to stop Israel. Letting Israel misuse the U.S. for misinformation or regime change in Iran is unacceptable. If the U.S. gets entangled, the long-term consequences could be severe.

Host:
Wouldn't a prolonged U.S. engagement in the Middle East benefit China by allowing it more strategic freedom?

Dr. Gao:
No. China benefits from global peace and stability. Any damage to peace, prosperity, or stability anywhere in the world is a loss for China and mankind. China doesn't seek conflict—it promotes peace.

Host:
President Trump hinted on social media that the U.S. knows where Iran’s Supreme Leader is hiding but won’t take him out "for now." How would China react if Iran’s leader were assassinated?

Dr. Gao:
Assassinating a head of state or military leader is never acceptable. It violates global norms and decency. It may also backfire. At a time when Israel has launched an undeclared war, such comments from the U.S. president are dangerously irresponsible.

Host:
You mentioned earlier the cordial ties between China and Iran. If Iran were to experience regime change—say, a pro-Western government replacing the current one—would that be a strategic loss for China?

Dr. Gao:
Not necessarily. China views events through a long-term lens—10, 100, even 500 years. We aren’t swayed by day-to-day developments. Israel's war is aggression. Iran is defending its sovereignty. If the U.S. joins Israel, they will be judged by history. We must prioritize ending the war and seeking peace. China supports a nuclear-free Middle East.

Host:
The U.S. and its allies have begun using a new acronym: “CRINK” – China, Russia, Iran, North Korea. What do you think of that?

Dr. Gao:
Acronyms don’t change facts. China is the world's largest trading nation with over 140 countries. It champions peace and free trade. Painting China as an enemy is false. The U.S. must not mistake China’s intentions. We have goodwill for the American people. Together, China and the U.S. can solve many problems. War between them is not an option—it must never be.

Host:
Could China or Russia intervene militarily if the U.S. joins Israel against Iran?

Dr. Gao:
A war imposed on Iran is unjust. If other countries join Israel, it could provoke a broader response. Iran is a large, powerful nation with spiritual influence across the Shia world. Escalating the war risks more devastation. It must be stopped immediately. China urges restraint from all sides. We prefer negotiations, not war.

Host:
Final thoughts on the “CRINK” label?

Dr. Gao:
It’s a distraction. China is a stabilizing force. Anyone suggesting otherwise is misrepresenting reality. China seeks peace, prosperity, and stability. The U.S. should work with us—not against us. This war, launched by Netanyahu for possibly personal reasons, must end. He won't escape justice at home or globally.

Host:
Dr. Victor Gao, thank you very much for joining us. Always a pleasure.

Dr. Gao:
Thank you for having me.

Wednesday

iPhone 17 Air to be the thinnest iPhone ever: What to expect

 The iPhone 17 series is anticipated to hit the market globally in September. In 2025, the rumour has it that the company will release a new entry, iPhone 17 Air, replacing the Plus model.

While there are several speculations doing rounds online, a recent leak shows what the phone might look like.

In the leak, the tipster @ MajinBu shared a hazy image of the alleged iPhone 17 Air's back cover. The single camera lens cut out on the left side of the bar indicates this image belongs to the upcoming iPhone 17 Air.

The leaked image also shows a pill-shaped, raised camera bar at the top, which is essentially the revamped design of the iPhone 17 series. The right side appears to house an LED flash and a small microphone opening.

Based on the romours, the iPhone 17 Air is to feature a slim profile with just 5.5mm thickness. If this rumour comes out as the real dimension, the iPhone 17 Air will beat the iPhone 6 (slimmest for now).

For this ultra-slim design, Apple might cut a few edges, including removal of physical SIM tray, a single camera lens and a smaller battery.

The iPhone 17 Air is also rumoured to feature a 6.6 inch OLED display with ProMotion technology, enabling a 120 Hz refresh rate.

The iPhone 17 Air is rumoured to feature a simplified design, highlighted by a single 48-megapixel rear camera - a shift from the dual-lens systems of current models.

On the front, it may include a 24-megapixel TrueDepth camera, delivering double the resolution of its predecessors.

In terms of performance, the iPhone 17 Air is anticipated to be powered by Apple's A19 chipset.

After the image, the confusion erupted online, claiming this rear panel could also belong to iPhone SE4.





                                                                              Source: indiatoday.in